SPD General Secretary Matthias Miersch has raised concerns amid growing political tensions. He accused the CDU of exploiting Berlin’s Senator for Culture, Joe Chialo. Miersch claimed they use Chialo as a political tool in a broader campaign against Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Miersch criticized both the CDU and “Focus Online.” He accused them of reigniting controversy over a remark made by Scholz. Miersch suggested that this controversy is being weaponized in the final phase of the election cycle.
The controversy stems from a comment made by Chancellor Scholz at a private event in early February. He reportedly referred to Chialo as a “court jester.” “Focus Online” was the first to report on the statement, triggering a political firestorm. After the report, Scholz contacted Chialo personally. He expressed regret if his words had been perceived as offensive. He emphasized that his intent was never racist.
Chialo has Tanzanian roots. He publicly acknowledged that he found the remark “degrading and hurtful.” However, he clarified that he does not view Scholz as a racist. He stated that after their conversation, he considered the issue resolved. However, the CDU has continued to press the matter. They frame it as an instance of racial insensitivity on Scholz’s part. The Chancellor strongly refutes this claim.
Miersch voiced concern about deliberate manipulation of the situation. He believes it is done for political gain, particularly by the CDU. He argued that genuine discussions on racism require self-reflection, not opportunistic exploitation. “It is deeply troubling to see the political ploy involving Joe Chialo,” Miersch remarked in an interview with SPIEGEL. “This involvement hinders a sincere dialogue on racial awareness.”
Amid the escalating rhetoric, Chialo himself has called for a fair and responsible election campaign, a sentiment Miersch fully supports. The SPD official emphasized that combating racism is a collective effort, requiring thoughtful discourse rather than sensationalized political attacks.
As election day approaches, this incident highlights the increasing polarization in German politics. Every remark—however unintended—can become fuel for larger political battles. Whether this controversy will significantly impact voter sentiment remains to be seen. However, it undoubtedly underscores the importance of handling sensitive issues with care. This approach is better than using them as political ammunition.
